1、国际期刊投稿交流以Emerald为例常旭出版关系主管Email:Mobile:134-66540716目录1,Emerald及平台简介2,投稿准备，审稿及成功发表3,中国作者常见问题4,Emerald学术研究基金Emerald及平台简介成立于1967年，来自世界百强商学院之一BradfordUniversity总部英国，全球十多个国家设立代表处，主编、作者遍布全球，内容国际独立主编模式：保持学术研究的独立性和个性化，良好的持续性涉及学科：管理学、图书馆学、工程学，以及其他人文社会科学AboutEmeraldAboutEmerald270+种种管理学领域出版期刊数量最多数量
2、最多的出版社涵盖24个学科领域个学科领域管理学管理学5大学科：管理科学与工程大学科：管理科学与工程工商管理工商管理公共管理公共管理图书情报学图书情报学农林经济管理农林经济管理其他其他交叉学科交叉学科和和泛管理泛管理领域的期刊领域的期刊经济管理市场营销教育管理战略管理质量管理企业与革新学习与发展国际商务管理人力资源管理信息与知识管理旅游管理行业与公营部门管理管理科学与研究商业道德与法律营运与物流管理建筑环境绩效管理与评估会计与金融组织研究区域管理研究图书馆与信息研究健康护理与社会关怀Emerald管理学期刊管理学期刊学科细分化会计与金融领域：26种高度细分化国际期刊会计、审计与职责
7、问题的期刊ChineseManagementStudiesChinaAgriculturalEconomicReview（2）、浏览期刊主页选题范围、写作指南、范文标题:最少的单词，表达最充分的意思摘要：（3）、修改论文格式结构性摘要出现于20世纪80年代后期明显不同之处在于行文中用醒目的字体(黑体、全部大写、或斜体),直接标出目的、方法、结果、结论等以便于读者了解论文的内容Emerald采用这种摘要类型。报道性摘要资料性或情报性摘要主要总结论文中的主要发现，运用于描述实验研究类论文和创新价值较大的、主题单一的文献.它向读者提供原文中的全部创新内容，提供尽可能多
8、的定量或定性的信息。指示性摘要介绍性摘要，也称陈述性摘要。主要介绍论文的论题和目的，用简单的几句话使读者对论文所研究的主要内容有一概括的了解，不需要介绍方法、结果、结论的具体内容，也不需要用数据进行定量描述。MiloradM.Novicevic,MarioHayek,TonyFang,(2011)IntegratingBarnardsandcontemporaryviewsofindustrialrelationsandHRM,JournalofManagementHistory,Vol.17Iss:1,pp.126-138Abst
9、ractPurposeThepurposeofthispaperistojuxtaposethecontemporaryviewsofindustrialrelations(IR)andhumanresourcemanagement(HRM)withtheideasexpressedbyChesterBarnard.Design/methodology/approachThepaperanalysesChesterBarnardsviewsalongthefourpremisesthatunderlieconte
10、mporaryperspectivesonthefieldsofIRandHRM.FindingsBarnardsmainpoints:thatsincerityandhonestyofmanagementiscrucialtodevelopinganindividualemployeeswilltocollaborate,andthatcollectivecooperationissuperiortocollectivebargainingarefoundtoresonatewellwiththecon
11、temporaryviewsandprovideaclearindicationforBarnardspreferenceofhumanresourceperspectivetotheIRperspective.Practical/SocialimplicationsThispaperprovidesBarnardspracticalinsightsintowhymanagingIRandHRbypoliciesleadstopoormanagement.Originality/valueThispaperis
12、thefirsttorecognizeBarnardsuniquecontributiontocontemporaryperspectivesonIRandHRMdisciplines.结构性摘要举例关键词关键词：数量限制，一般4-6个论文类型论文类型：7种（见右图）正文正文：字数限制4,0006,000单词PaperType（3）、修改论文格式Harvardstyle:哈佛格式，作者在正文中用圆括号注出所引用文献的作者和出版年，在文后参考文献列表中提供所引文献的详细信息，参考文献列表以作者姓氏的字母顺序排序。MLA(theModernLang
15、plicationofatheoreticalmodeltothetopic,andhenceIthinkitisappropriateforJDoc.IamsubmittinganarticlewithasimilartitletoPublicLibraryJournal.However,thatarticlegivesaseriesofcasestudies,ratherthandescribingandapplyingthemodel,andsoisquitedistinctfromth
16、epapersubmittedhere.IcansendacopyofthePLJpaperifrequired.不建议使用的coveringletter:IamsendingthisarticleforyoutopublishinJournalofDocumentation,afteryoureditorialamendments.IhavechosenJDoctopublishthispaper,asitisahigh-impactandwell-regardedjournal.Covering
18、tionresearch.Inarewrite,therearetwothingsthatIwouldliketoseeinstead.Iwouldexpectaclearerattempttoestablishtheresearch-practicegapasanintellectualchallenge.Thisisthemainthemeofthepaperanditwouldthereforebeusefultosubstantiateyourunderstandingofthisgap
19、beyondthesurfacelevel.NextcommentYouimplythatyoudonotwishtoseeatutorialtoCAR(eventhoughonereviewerthinksthatthisisneededsincesomesectionsoftheMISQreadershipmaynotbefamiliarwithCAR).Weconcurwithyouandhaveremovedthetutorialaspects.Thefrontendofthe
20、paper(pages2-5)hasbeenrevisedinordertooutlinetheresearchandpracticalproblemsthatwefocusedon.Weagreethattheresearch-practicegapneedstobepositionedclearlyasanintellectualchallenge(ashighlightedonpage3).Wehavenowdeliberatelypositionedthepaperinthiswaywith
21、thechallengemanifestedintheaction-researchdichotomy,whereeitheractionorresearchtendstobethefocusofactionresearchprojects(asexplainedonpage3).WealsosubstantiateourargumentsbetterinthebroaderCARliterature(asdetailedfrompages5-14).NextresponseRef#ReviewerC
23、therissues.Thisisdifficultforeditors.Inseveralcasestheyhaverefusedtoshortentheirpaperstothe6,000wordlimit.InonecaseanauthorsaidthatifIwantedtocutthepaperIcouldeliminatethereferences.ThisweekIreceivedapaperthatwas20,000words,andtheauthorcomplained
24、whenIreturnedit.Iletthemknowthattheguidelinesarenotnegotiable,buttheChineseauthorsaretheonlyonesintheworldthatprotesttherequestsforchanges.Thishasbeenverysurprising.thatwesimplydontunderstand;followinginstructions(forexample,structuredabstract)isstill
25、aproblem.papersbyChineseauthorsaremorelikelytocontainEnglishgrammarproblems,notconformtotherequiredresearchpaperstructure,areweakinresearchtrainingandwritingforinternationaljournals,lackacriticalanalysisoftherelatedstudiesAnotherlimitationofChinesepapersis
26、thattheyoftenfailtoprovideaconceptualortheoreticalbasisfortheirhypotheses.LacknovelpracticalortheoreticalcontributionshaveweakEnglishbemethodologicallysimplisticreplicateWesternresearchfindingsinChinawithoutconsideringtheindigenousChinesecontextThemajorissuere
27、latestothefactthatmostpapersdonotcontributetothefieldandscopeofthejournal.Paperareeitheraplugandplay(replicationofpreviousstudies),datacrunchingstatisticalanalysiswithnoimplicationsand/orpapersthatdonotfitthescopeofthejournalVoicesFromEditorsIbeliev
28、ethisisbecausethereisastresstopeopletopublishinordertopublishandnotforconductinginnovativeresearchManuscriptsfromAsiaingeneral,andChinainparticularareoftenmoreliterature-driventhanissue-driven.FirstletmesaythatwedonothavehugenumbersofsubmissionsfromCh
29、inaaswedidinthepast,becausewordhasspreadthatwecomedownveryhardonplagiarism.BythisImeanthatChineseauthorswillsometimesreviewtheliteratureonaspecifictopicorgroupoftopicsanddevelophypothesesormodelswiththejustificationbeingthatthehypothesesormodelspr